A clearer understanding. A more practical approach.
EMFPracticalAssess your room ↗
Home / Research resources

RESEARCH RESOURCES

Evidence for the questions you’re asking.

Explore shielding test methods, phone accessories, Faraday storage, product claims, public-health guidance and measurement documentation.

INTERACTIVE LESSON & SIMULATOR

Interactive Comparison: FCC / ICNIRP vs. Building Biology Limits

Explore the 10,000,000-fold logarithmic gap between official thermal heating guidelines and non-thermal biological thresholds (SBM-2015).

Compare safety standards ↗
Read the source type before the conclusion. A test method, manufacturer specification, public-health assessment and clinical study answer different questions. Inclusion here does not establish that a commercial product works.

Shielding materials, clothing & home products

TEST METHOD · PUBLIC SUMMARY / PAID STANDARD

ASTM D4935: planar-material shielding tests

The published scope describes testing flat materials under defined far-field conditions. Useful when reading fabric or panel reports; it does not certify a finished garment or installed room. The public scope was checked; the full standard was not reviewed.

Read source ↗

OUR READING GUIDE

From a material report to a product claim

Questions to ask about the tested sample, frequencies, geometry and limitations. This is our editorial checklist, not an independent laboratory study.

Read our guide ↗

TEST METHOD · PUBLIC SUMMARY / PAID STANDARD · INACTIVE-RESERVED

IEEE Std 299-2006: shielding-enclosure effectiveness

The published scope covers measuring the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of enclosures using a defined test procedure. IEEE has since marked this edition (and its 2013 small-enclosure companion, 299.1) inactive-reserved, so treat it as a historical reference for test methodology, not a currently maintained standard. It also answers a narrower question than "does this product block EMF" — check what was tested, at which frequencies, and under what geometry before applying it to a garment, panel or room. The public scope was checked; the full standard was not reviewed.

Read source ↗

Phone accessories & Faraday storage

CONSUMER GUIDANCE · 2011

FTC: cellphone radiation shields

Consumer guidance about partial shielding claims and possible effects on phone operation. This historical guidance is not a test of every currently available case.

Read source ↗

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE · 2014

NIST: mobile-device forensics

SP 800-101 Rev. 1 addresses mobile-device forensics, including radio isolation. Relevant background for shielding containers; not a health-benefit study or a consumer product endorsement.

Read source ↗

OFFICIAL GUIDANCE

FCC: cellphones and specific absorption rate (SAR)

Explains what SAR measures, how the FCC tests devices, and how to look up your own phone's reported value. SAR describes RF energy absorption under a specific test protocol — it is not a measure of a shielding accessory's effect, and a lower SAR does not by itself indicate lower real-world exposure during actual use.

Read source ↗

Health claims, neutralizers & harmonizers

CLAIM-SUBSTANTIATION GUIDANCE · 2022

FTC: Health Products Compliance Guidance

Explains how supporting evidence should match an advertised health claim. Useful for evaluating the kind of evidence requested from a seller; not product-specific proof for a neutralizer, garment or shield.

Read source ↗

OUR READING GUIDE

Assessing neutralizer and harmonizer claims

A framework for defining the claimed outcome and reviewing matching evidence. We have not completed a product-specific evaluation of Blushield or other neutralizer models.

Read our guide ↗

FTC ENFORCEMENT ACTION · 2002–2003

FTC: cellphone radiation-patch marketers settle false-claims charges

A concrete precedent, not a general warning: the FTC charged sellers of radiation-shielding patches with making unsupported claims, and marketers later settled. Useful for seeing what an "unsupported claim" looks like in practice; it does not describe any product sold on this site or elsewhere today.

Read source ↗

Public-health guidance & research assessments

PUBLIC HEALTH GUIDANCE

FDA: cellphones and RF radiation

An overview of the FDA’s assessment and links to scientific evidence. Scope: cellphone RF; not a blanket statement about every electromagnetic source.

Read source ↗

LITERATURE ASSESSMENT

FDA review: RF radiation and cancer

A review of literature published between 2008 and 2018. Read the scope, dates and limitations before applying its conclusions.

Read source ↗

INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES · 2020

ICNIRP: RF EMF exposure guidelines

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection's 2020 reference exposure limits, used as a basis for regulation in many countries. Guidelines set exposure limits from established (thermal) effects with safety margins; they are not a study of any specific product, and adoption varies by country.

Read source ↗

Measurement methods & instrument documentation

MEASUREMENT GUIDANCE

Ofcom: EMF compliance and enforcement

Methods and records for spectrum licensees. These compliance procedures should not be confused with a consumer room risk score.

Read source ↗

MANUFACTURER DOCUMENTATION

TriField TF2 technical specifications

Field modes, measurement ranges and stated accuracy conditions. Manufacturer claims are useful specifications, not our independent test results.

Read source ↗

MANUFACTURER DOCUMENTATION

Safe and Sound Pro II documentation

Distinguishes detection coverage from the stated frequency-response range. Confirm the exact version being purchased.

Read source ↗

MEASUREMENT GUIDANCE

OSHA: evaluating ELF (extremely low frequency) exposure

Occupational guidance on evaluating extremely low frequency electric and magnetic field exposure — the ELF/magnetic-field counterpart to Ofcom's RF-focused compliance guidance above. Written for workplace assessment, not consumer room measurement, but the measurement principles carry over.

Read source ↗

What this library does not yet contain

We have not assembled product-specific independent studies for individual clothing, home shielding, laptop accessory or neutralizer models. This is a curated starting library, not a systematic review. Category guides identify questions to investigate; they do not fill those evidence gaps.

For each product report, record the exact model or material, method, test conditions, date, funding and limitations. Keep physical performance separate from any claimed health outcome.

Source links and public summaries checked 21 September 2026, including five additions (IEEE Std 299, FCC SAR guidance, the FTC radiation-patch enforcement action, ICNIRP's 2020 guidelines, and OSHA's ELF exposure guidance). Earlier source notes retain their original scope. No independent product testing is claimed.